The 5.9% Unemployment Lie of Obama

It’s getting close to election time so you can be sure of two things: the rhetoric will heat UP and the unemployment rate will go DOWN. Like gasoline prices, you can pretty much tell when they will go up (just before the summer vacation driving season) and when they will go down (just after the summer vacation driving season).

Tuesday November 4, 2014 is mid-term election day and the official unemployment rate for September is down to 5.9%. And it took a pretty good jump too from a high of 6.7% in March to 6.1% in August. Now, Obama and the democrat party can crow about unemployment in the fives. Except there’s one slightly MASSIVE problem with that rate — it’s a lie.

Look at the this graph from Shadow I will be calling your attention to this graph again.

Shadow Stats is a website devoted to exposing the lie about any economic recovery claimed by the government. The proprietor is a Mr. John Williams and he does NOT make this up. He gets his data straight from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The only difference is, he doesn’t put lipstick on this pig of the Obama Economy. Look at the graph again and you will notice two very telling things. The most obvious is that for as long as Obama has been in the White House, the unemployment rate has never fallen below 20%! So you can forget the taurusfimus from Obama’s apologists in the liberal press telling us that “recovery is right around the corner.” That must be one helluva corner because we’ve been going around it since 2010.

The other thing that is quite noticeable is the trend. The graph goes back 20 years to 1994. Look at the trend between the government lie of the official unemployment rate (the bottom track), the median rate (the middle track), and the actual unemployment rate (the upper track). You will notice that when Bill Clinton was lying about the unemployment rate in the 1990s, the government lie of the “official” unemployment rate track “paralleled” the true unemployment rate almost perfectly. In the year after 9-11 when Bush43 got tax rates cut that provided business with the stimulus of less money going to the government, the true unemployment rate went down again and the government lie “paralleled” it yet again. Even when the Bill Clinton-caused mortgage fiasco hit in 2007-2008, the rates again “paralleled” each other.

Then Obama happened — and something changed. Starting in 2009, the “official” government lie of the unemployment rate STOPPED “paralleling” the true unemployment rate and has slowly been creeping downward while the true unemployment rate has remained somewhere near 22-23 percent for Obama’s entire reign of error. This is NOT some accident of numbers. Someone didn’t fat-finger the numeric ten key on their keyboard for 5 years running. This was blatantly intentional! Yes, when Clinton and Bush43 lied about the unemployment rate it was also intentional. But their crime was to just understate the true unemployment rate by about 8%. NOT Obama! He is not understating anything. He is willfully misrepresenting the unemployment rate by a whopping 17%! As BigFurHat said on his blog I Own The World, “If the melanin shield erected around Obama by the progressive press was dropped, Obama would be considered the worst president in the history of our nation.”

When Carter’s unemployment rate was sky high, Ronald Reagan cared enough about those unemployed to actually work with the democrat majority in both the House and the Senate to get taxes cut and get the economy going. Barack Obama cares about no one except Barack Obama.



Accidental Racism

Watch this video and see if you can Spot the Accidental Racism!

Did you see it? Of course you didn’t. You can’t, because only a liberal can spot accidental racism. Intelligent people know there is no such thing. All racism is intentional such as the democrats passing the Fugitive Slave Act in the 1850s or the democrats doing all they could to keep slavery alive before the Civil War or the democrats voting against the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments or the democrats creating the Ku Klux Klan or in the late 19th century, the democrats repealing the civil rights legislation passed by the Republicans or the democrats passing the Jim Crow laws or the democrats lynching blacks or the democrats voting against making lynching a federal crime or the democrats filibustering the civil rights legislation of the mid 1950s or the democrats attacking the civil rights marchers in the late 50s and through the 60s or the passage of democrat LBJ’s “Great Society” which has led to the destruction of the black family.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure ALL racism is intentional.

No, it IS Obama’s fault

This is a comment by Wraith left on this topic at IOwnTheWorld. The original post is from The People’s Cube. Some progtard took a picture of his poster of his eight reasons why he supports Obama.

I’m gonna slap the next person that whines about Obummer “inheriting” fill-in-the-blank from Bush. As if [the] dude was just standing around picking his nose and minding his own business, and we all came up and said, “You’re the President now. Fix all this.”

He wanted the job, he campaigned for it, he swore that the seas were going to recede and the planet was going to heal and free beer would fall from the sky and nothing bad would ever happen to anyone ever again, if only we elected him. Well, he got it — and he therefore owns the clusterfuck this country’s turned into under his pathetic and traitorous excuse for “leadership.”

But I shouldn’t be surprised that Obamanoids are still trying to blame everyone else but the responsible party. After all, that’s the core of Leftist thought.

{* bold and italics not in the original}

So the next time some mongoloid liberal stops dragging his knuckles, starts scratching his ass, and says, “Our messiah inherited this from Bush,” you can answer him with Wraith’s statement above.

Thank you, Wraith. The perfect answer to when the liberal douchebags blame anyone other than Obama.

California Penal Code Section 187, "Reduction" Defined

…HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told a House panel Thursday that a reduction in the number of human beings born in the United States will compensate employers and insurers for the cost of complying with the new HHS mandate…

So, which gov’t agency decides who gets “reduced?” Since you know it’s going to be the gov’t, that means we would have to have groups of people…say, panels…deciding who lives and dies. I thought the liberals said ObamaCare didn’t have death panels?

Is “reduced” the new socialist code word for murder? Typical socialists. They deal in euphemism when they want to put one past you. Liberal socialists have tried euphemism before; though something tells me that those 6 million Jews don’t considered themselves “questioned.”

Why Ron Paul is dangerous

Posted by Stranded in Sonoma

If Ron Paul had the same convictions as Ronald Reagan with regards to foreign policy and geopolitics, I would vote for him. But he doesn’t!

His stance on foreign policy is similar to that of the isolationists in this country just prior to WWII. But it’s worse than that. When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, even the most ardent of isolationists took a look at world events and realized this country was deep in the National Socialist doo-doo. Even they knew we were in a fight for our very freedom.

But even after the USS Cole bombing, 9-11, thousands of “honor” killings, beheadings of non-believers, “The Arab Spring,” and sharia creep in this country, Ron Paul still doesn’t get it! Once again, we are in a fight for our freedom — for our very way of life. And Ron Paul is willing to play kissy-face with the leaders of islam.

This is why Ron Paul is as dangerous as Barack Obama.